From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Apr  3 19:00:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA16419
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 19:00:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA16391
          Wed, 3 Apr 1996 19:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 19:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199604040300.TAA16391@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
Subject: Re: bin/1114: vi's `>>' commands do not work as expected if tabs!=8
Reply-To: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/1114; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
To: mi@aldan.saturn.net
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/1114: vi's `>>' commands do not work as expected if tabs!=8
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 21:55:42 -0500 (EST)

 On Wed, 3 Apr 1996 mi@aldan.saturn.net wrote:
 >
 > >Synopsis:       If tabs is set to smth other then 8, block shifts work wrong
 
     This isn't a bug.  See the "shiftwidth" variable setting (set sw).
 --
 Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org)
 System and Network Administrator, Internex Online Inc.
 "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"