From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 16 06:39:03 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A28C37B404
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from laptop.tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EEEB43FB1
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com)
Received: (qmail 12497 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 13:38:58 -0000
Received: from queequeg.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241)
  by 0 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 13:38:58 -0000
Message-ID: <3E9D5CF2.7090606@tenebras.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:38:58 -0700
From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh-cn, zh-tw
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Caley <rjc@caley.org.uk>
References: <200304121438.h3CEct41030991@lurza.secnetix.de>
	<3E9840B8.F00E018F@tel.fer.hr> <87smsiohwe.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <87smsiohwe.fsf@pele.r.caley.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Forcible delaying of UFS (soft)updates
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:39:03 -0000

Richard Caley wrote:

> Additionally there could be a really_really_fysnc call ...

There is.  It is used in hundreds of programs.  It is called fsync (2).