Date: 13 Feb 2001 17:45:11 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03@gte.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. Message-ID: <xzpu25yv8fc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Alexander N. Kabaev"'s message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:41:07 -0500 (EST)" References: <XFMail.20010213114107.ak03@gte.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03@gte.com> writes: > I know this will sound silly, but if numbers in shared libraries file names > mean nothing to the loader, why can't we just go back to using > lib.so.<major>.<minor> naming convention for libc? Jumping between versions > (5xx -> 5) just does not seem right. Because the loader would ignore the minor number - plus, the semantics we want are not those that minor library version numbers used to have. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu25yv8fc.fsf>