From owner-freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Thu Jun 1 04:36:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA45BF4FD2 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 04:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C15F7A3C0 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 04:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v514am4a072553 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 04:36:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219699] Issue with IPv6 and neighbor notification Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 04:36:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: standards X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: paul@tmp.group X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 04:36:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219699 --- Comment #1 from Paul G Webster --- Just a clarification;=20 'because obviously, my assigned /64 could not reach there gateway, from wha= t I understand from the IPv6 folks I should be able to simply set the gateway to the interface without such a hack, but once again realistically; no idea.' If I do attempt to set the gateway on the interface, it cannot 'find' the gateway almost like it was having trouble looking it up. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=