From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 15 16:48:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EEA5E16A4CE; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:48:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
	(fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.71])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5514743D1F; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:48:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: from [192.168.0.1] ([63.139.3.63])
	by fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP
	<20040316004759.TOWO230350.fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@[192.168.0.1]>;
	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:47:59 -0500
Received: from 192.168.0.200
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej)
        by 192.168.0.1 with HTTP;
        Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:48:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <2697.192.168.0.200.1079398101.squirrel@192.168.0.1>
In-Reply-To: <20040316004046.GA74287@router.laiers.local>
References: <2650.192.168.0.200.1079393908.squirrel@192.168.0.1>
    <20040316000153.GA73860@router.laiers.local>
    <2662.192.168.0.200.1079396323.squirrel@192.168.0.1>
    <20040316004046.GA74287@router.laiers.local>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:48:21 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com>
To: "Max Laier" <max@love2party.net>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
	fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [63.139.3.63] using ID
	<mikej@rogers.com> at Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:47:59 -0500
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 05:02:50 -0800
cc: net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Byte counters reset at ~4GB
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:48:26 -0000

Max Laier said:

> Sure, you measure it ;) ... no, of course it is more expensive to update a
> 64bit counter on a 32bit arch, but the key (once again) is descision:
> While
> (almost) all of the pf counters are 64bit types you can configure it not
> to
> use the loginterface or whatsoever more. So it's up to you: You need 64bit
> counters? You shall have them! You need *fast* 64bit counters? AMD sells
> nice processors (they say)! ... you get the idea.

Got it. In just curious though... realistically, how big of an impact on
performance is this on a modern CPU? Is it not simply the original 32bit
calculation x 2?