From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 16 13:09:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 9CBB21065673; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:09:00 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: v@fatpipi.com Message-ID: <20100716130900.GA54493@FreeBSD.org> References: <201007161014.o6GAEB34018093@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Pietro Cerutti Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/textproc/xqilla Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:09:00 -0000 On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Vanilla Hsu wrote: > xqilla 2.2.4 required xerces-c version 3.x, that's why i did not commit this > pr. Which in turn raises these questions: - Why PR number was not referenced in the commit log? (148273) - Why didn't you (vanilla@) added the requirement for new xerces in audit log, and/or marked the PR as analyzed or pending feedback? - If 2.2.4 is totally broken with current xerces-c, how is that possible at all that this got committed? It suggests that no required run-time testing was done, if even build fails. Am I missing something, or things got really bad here? ./danfe > > 2010/7/16 Pietro Cerutti > > > gahr 2010-07-16 10:14:11 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > textproc/xqilla Makefile distinfo > > Log: > > - Update to 2.2.4 > > > > Approved by: maintainer (timeout after 15 days)