From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 20 13:24:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7C6FB16A4DA; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9AD7943D5D; Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3KKOcoc023454;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:24:39 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: "Christian S.J. Peron" <maneo@bsdpro.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:00:27 -0000."
             <20040420200027.A51891@staff.seccuris.com> 
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 22:24:38 +0200
Message-ID: <23453.1082492678@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Raw sockets in jails 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:24:45 -0000

In message <20040420200027.A51891@staff.seccuris.com>, "Christian S.J. Peron" w
rites:
>Poul/group
>
>The following patch makes raw sockets comply with prison IP addresses.
>Some tools such as traceroute(8) may require that the prison IP address
>be specified on the command line. I.E.
>
>	traceroute -s <prison ip> <dest address>
>
>Otherwise it might fail.

How does traceroute and ping normally determine which source address 
to use ?   Can't we use that mechanism to default them to the right thing ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.