Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:53:33 -0500 From: Chris Bowman <chris@korcett.com> To: Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, "Chris Bowman \(Home\)" <chrishome@austin.rr.com> Subject: Re: [6.x patchset] Ipfw nat and libalias modules Message-ID: <46E0146D.8060508@korcett.com> In-Reply-To: <20070906123417.GA95067@tin.it> References: <46DF68EE.1010905@austin.rr.com> <20070906123417.GA95067@tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050804050202030505010607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It was indeed the tarball downloaded from http://ubi8.imc.pi.cnr.it/~flag/libalias/libalias.tgz ... Thank you, I'll give the 7.x code a try. Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:41:50PM -0500, Chris Bowman (Home) wrote: > >> I was recently testing the in kernel nat patch, which is an absolutely >> wonderful addition in my opinion. I have however run into one issue, when >> for example I do the following : >> >> ipfw nat 10 config ip 2.2.2.2 >> > [snip] > > Where did you get the 6.x patch? Did you find a tarball around or > you backported the code from 7.x? > > In the first case, that patch is old and buggy, and AFAIK the bug you encountered > was due to an uninitialized conditional variable. > > bye, > P. > > > -- --------------050804050202030505010607--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46E0146D.8060508>