From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 13 15:30: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E5437B718 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:30:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2DNU3C04588; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:30:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:30:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103132330.f2DNU3C04588@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Stefan `Sec` Zehl Subject: Re: ports/25670: Fix of x11/xmove by Maintainer. Reply-To: Stefan `Sec` Zehl Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/25670; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stefan `Sec` Zehl To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/25670: Fix of x11/xmove by Maintainer. Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 00:22:00 +0100 On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:24:45AM +0900, FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: > USE_IMAKE can't be used for this port as it does not have Imakefile. I know. That's why i didn't use USE_IMAKE. From cvsweb i see that sobomax probably added this. > Proper fix is to use own Imakefile instead of Makefile. Of course. But I don't know how to do it, so I had to wrok around it. > How about this patch? Looks good to me. As I see now it has already been committed, so my comment was probably not needed. :-) CU, Sec -- You haven't seen _multitasking_ until you have seen Doom and Quake run side by side. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message