From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 17 9:10:53 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F7C37B40D; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:10:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA22978; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:00:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Terry Lambert Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Greg Lehey , Andrew Kenneth Milton , Michael Lucas , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: devfs deficiencies (was: devfs and Vinum (was: any -current && vinum problems?)) In-Reply-To: <3B7CD25F.703F6D4D@mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Julian Elischer writes: > > > > >Well you timed them out without askling the developer what he had in the > > >wings and that was more than impolite, it was stupid, because most of the > > >shortcomings of devfs and SLICE had been solved and all I was waiting for > > >was the CAM switchover, so that I didn't have to do everything twice. you don't even think it was implolite? > > > > Yeah, and together with Terrys VFS patches that would have made Microsoft > > bankrupt overnight. > > > > Sure... > > Hardly; many of my VFS patches were designed to make the > code more portable... for instance, to Windows 95, where they > ran without problems starting ~1995/1996... > > -- Terry > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message