From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Jun 11 11:32:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A187AEFF05 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2127A2A6A for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j7so36111364lfg.1 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:32:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wU49vHY1S7/tZ0mHg+YchikEaXO3Fd1rHspkGJJIAgU=; b=ZrX+QMHwnKqBl50NxTK6AqUO7AtlS1SAATeGAXK9JdyUsAHAUZVF3vGVzfnaONJRJE OJbbxn3wK3KAvGRLY3Wi/dcukP7vNgkp0tETxPoAOftz/jteUaIoNHWgZvUIbody0pyH y1/TNiU8JPJDTPMwKZTOgjAOblHKphCZ5Aa/ozUdzXjkqFfCpXDGV8t2Y52A7XYBIbNr +/QcqDOHQTzlcBD6k5LaTfR3hfrugOhs8wqDXxq2zC9RweGbk3AFNyHJlCL1yc4H0htH EZlB+sikPRUzt0UHmGN2yMNQwoSu3Rv8F6Tu/x/ehY2pr0uqARQsyYZ5NM8fEK7r2svN ZnKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=wU49vHY1S7/tZ0mHg+YchikEaXO3Fd1rHspkGJJIAgU=; b=P3dZS9jznUKDSkatsSlvqkaA1ai1956MoR6OTlkmWPa/FfATYXYzRvhGhnxQjxjnLe 41jguXXyyjLddh3ZtzR7/Mi5xOfaCN+5VXpJZON8o2WhOpAuYSJWQpQvIvwes7fimFsI +hDS9CYu5cFTxuPaJytQJcKT+40Mtosa8RkaQMgzHpghkEba/fJkkQreJ3MG04FwqZ5L FHgk2R77y+EZ7CI2WcVq/fWJyYwYS32foiQnC7jVYH6mBiPL77xA1BxqWIMqynKeeWiz vecywsfpQ6gPezSw3GekQbWyOrDjEdEmzsiqfou3WkKjJuk6UdmylzpZnaxKyTxBObtR PQqA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJozXzJCuYneY63SGUrXMjrTRAZmd89oQGhGg9twXSbUk5WpTirU7KlPCBqdSfYSKDwQJgv+zJOLHNaPw== X-Received: by 10.25.141.75 with SMTP id p72mr1457904lfd.86.1465644776270; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:32:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.173.15 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:32:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160611103834.GA75085@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <1F5A9247-7C98-483C-A4BD-4A3D54208B3D@alumni.tu-berlin.de> From: Domagoj Stolfa Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:32:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: The OpenBSD pledge To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:32:58 -0000 Yes, it would maybe make sense to do so. I am not too familiar with capsicum(4), but glancing over it, it might be possible. If anything, it would allow for code reuse from the OpenBSD ports and increased portability in the future. Maybe the people who have worked with capsicum(4) or have developed it could give some more insight on this. Domagoj