From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Nov 27 20:15:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93605DE6AFE for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: from mail.wilcox-tech.com (mail.wilcox-tech.com [45.32.83.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.wilcox-tech.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C9D934CA for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com) Received: (qmail 24787 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2017 20:14:58 -0000 Received: from 107-131-85-28.lightspeed.tulsok.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?192.168.1.78?) (awilcox@wilcox-tech.com@107.131.85.28) by mail.wilcox-tech.com with ESMTPA; 27 Nov 2017 20:14:58 -0000 Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: From: "A. Wilcox" Message-ID: <5A1C723C.2040104@Wilcox-Tech.com> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:14:52 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q7bCVF6iRqmEbxVv9f30Dcvi7MNL6tjf8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:15:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --q7bCVF6iRqmEbxVv9f30Dcvi7MNL6tjf8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/11/17 10:37, Chris H wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:50:46 -0330 "Jonathan Anderson" > said >> On 27 Nov 2017, at 1:01, Bill Sorenson wrote: >> > I for one would recommend leaving things alone unless it is a >> > substantive improvement. >> That's a sound principle, but if we move the datfiles (other than >> `freebsd-tips`) into ports, we could take all of the future time we >> would otherwise spend debating fortune(6) and use it for... anything >> else. :) I would call that a substantive improvement. > Following your assertion; if I were to pass a women being violated, > knowing my intervention would end it. > Should I simply pass it by, knowing the time I save would allow me > the time to get that cup of coffee I really wanted? the "moralisation" of discussions is dehumanising, and comparing moving bytes in a computer around with intervening in the assault of a woman is demeaning to women *and* insulting to those of us who have been assaulted= =2E --arw --=20 A. Wilcox (awilfox) Open-source programmer (C, C++, Python) https://code.foxkit.us/u/awilfox/ --q7bCVF6iRqmEbxVv9f30Dcvi7MNL6tjf8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJaHHI9AAoJEMspy1GSK50UHGsP/i6HuPGg9Qq44K7lMbdzekOc yw0fOUI7y00bX+S+ZuK3g12Ej8S8+hcvwQCIxWsriAPexWnPwN/lyaLEADYWJxXh dflwUH0sYrusFLxURKeLcUFejClDnaoaV5c7s0PfyNEey8hhlWiW4bkeQySAyBp7 /66g/REpqF6nO3p5NhuoddyLsDThWZMvxIg1zMdaBwhTCF1aKV2vUq8ASuZNzrYY 8fjrsVFs00bYifBEIpKUu9y1AR8O+mBZTufLE6rvkn8U+ZXsQnYprepfFWohqhla KllILvU+h6xT3PTAjtjxN524cDPhot3uV+xOsz1lJ+6h+TzwIfU/hMCg6VXPVSzV RjP8W0ZujZgnTxxWDFo1SdBKTnx3WqulsB/ui+SShIzAvNsgZ9Q7lSPo5OjbfH28 jAKEgsfZ27VSmxg3T+5t9zraMMQjNUi+FrsbRoDkErOLu1D+GO6t+sNKqt7kZrCm PxtivYl5FsfLrZx5+VwCg2gxSBvdg1zAbrCWGNI1iXpgbqfCq4sSC73j4eABRKpC iZ1iiVr2xlYPWe6vFlxHTLHNW8FPcabxXVy28nHhjbBVAGy+YCxTTyg9UbKYd6Tp hzl5Ba6leRhWEEDiuWQ+7V5vLcw2c14XRxD3Zf15p9GV4hmSFrDbM75MoMXBJUpK ySq2oXsRKHZEmvcZeTMS =7mUr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q7bCVF6iRqmEbxVv9f30Dcvi7MNL6tjf8--