From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jul 27  6:54:35 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from tardis.patho.gen.nz (tardis.patho.gen.nz [203.97.2.226])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9557E14DBF
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 06:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jabley@tardis.patho.gen.nz)
Received: (from jabley@localhost)
	by tardis.patho.gen.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA18844
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 01:54:29 +1200 (NZST)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 01:54:28 +1200
From: Joe Abley <jabley@patho.gen.nz>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: coda in STABLE
Message-ID: <19990728015428.A27527@patho.gen.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i
X-Files: the Truth is Out There
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

From /sys/coda/coda.h on 3.2-STABLE, it looks like the version in the tree
is 3.1.

At http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/download.html#gpl_notice it is mentioned
that version 5 clients and servers are not backwards compatible
with version 4 (and by inference, previous versions, hence my first
paragraph). Earlier on the same page, -CURRENT is mentioned, but not -STABLE.

Does -CURRENT have different kernel hooks for coda than -STABLE? If so,
does anybody know if work is progressing to back-port the changes?

If anybody has any general experience of coda on FreeBSD, and feels like
sharing it, I'm keen to listen :)


Joe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message