From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 13 23:57:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E8B10656AE for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandrews@bit0.com) Received: from magnum.bit0.com (magnum.bit0.com [207.246.88.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813078FC15 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandrews@bit0.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by magnum.bit0.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E664A9E95; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:41:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bit0.com Received: from magnum.bit0.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (magnum.int.bit0.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pHrvCTjctYos; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:41:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from beast.int.bit0.com (beast.int.bit0.com [172.27.0.2]) by magnum.bit0.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:41:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:41:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Andrews X-X-Sender: mandrews@beast.int.bit0.com To: Aragon Gouveia In-Reply-To: <4A342067.1000603@phat.za.net> Message-ID: References: <4A342067.1000603@phat.za.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French Subject: Re: reecommendations for an 'appliance" platform ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:57:55 -0000 On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Aragon Gouveia wrote: > Hi, > > Pete French wrote: >>> I'm not 100% sure, but fairly sure that you'll have a hard time >>> finding something that combines the low-power standalone type spec with >>> a 64-bit capable processor. Once you get the higher-end processor, >> >> That was my experiense when shopping around yes - annoying as I >> don't need anything particularly low power (it ain't going to >> be my leccy bill :-). > > The Atom 230 and 330 are supposed to be 64-bit capable: > > http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=36331,35635,35641, > > but I have not personally tested either with an AMD64 FreeBSD install. I have a Supermicro 5015A-H on the way, which is a 1U rackmount Atom 330 box, and am planning to run 7.2-STABLE amd64 on it. We'll see how it goes. No flash card slots, so you'd need adapters -- I was just going to use a pair of leftover 2.5" disks I had on the shelf.