From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 30 19:52:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878AC1065670; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:51:59 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20090429161626.GQ1387@albert.catwhisker.org> <49F9CD25.70102@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_jFg+JVteRvql0NH" Message-Id: <200904301552.03118.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pluknet , Andriy Gapon , Scott Ullrich Subject: Re: Panic "Fatal trap 18: integer divide fault while in kernel mode" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:52:13 -0000 --Boundary-00=_jFg+JVteRvql0NH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 30 April 2009 12:37 pm, pluknet wrote: > 2009/4/30 Andriy Gapon : > > on 30/04/2009 18:58 David Wolfskill said the following: > >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 06:35:32PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> on 30/04/2009 18:18 David Wolfskill said the following: > >>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:16:26AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > >>>>> Is there anything of use I might get from DDB? > >>>> > >>>> I can still poke around there for a bit, if that would be > >>>> useful. > >>> > >>> In general the stack trace[*] should be provided at the very > >>> least, otherwise people have hard figuring out where the > >>> problem occurred, so right people may just not notice a report. > >> > >> Sorry; it happened so quickly, I wasn't at all certain there > >> would be enough to show: > >> > >> db> bt > >> Tracing pid 0 tid 100000 td 0xc0d43610 > >> cpu_topo(2,c1420d34,c081ff07,c1420d58,c0820042,...) at > >> cpu_topo+0x43 smp_topo(c0804378,2,c4145a5c,fffffff,0,...) at > >> smp_topo+0x10b > >> sched_setup(0,141ec00,141ec00,141e000,1425000,...) at > >> sched_setup+0x1a mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x96 > >> begin() at begin+0x2c > > > > My guess is that (cpu_cores * cpu_logical) somehow equals to > > zero. > > That was masked earlier by additional checks on zero, > and now that routine moved to the separate function > (and to separate call path from subr_smp.c:mp_start() > which seems not to be called). > > > Have you by a chance saved this crash dump? > > I think that t would be interesting to look at it in kgdb. Please try the attached patch. Jung-uk Kim --Boundary-00=_jFg+JVteRvql0NH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="mp_machdep.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mp_machdep.diff" --- sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c (revision 191699) +++ sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c (working copy) @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ else if (type == CPUID_TYPE_CORE) cpu_cores = cnt; } + if (cpu_cores == 0) + cpu_cores = 1; if (cpu_logical == 0) cpu_logical = 1; cpu_cores /= cpu_logical; --- sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c (revision 191699) +++ sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c (working copy) @@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ else if (type == CPUID_TYPE_CORE) cpu_cores = cnt; } + if (cpu_cores == 0) + cpu_cores = 1; if (cpu_logical == 0) cpu_logical = 1; cpu_cores /= cpu_logical; --Boundary-00=_jFg+JVteRvql0NH--