Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:33:44 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Turion 64 X2 support in future versions of FreeBSD. Message-ID: <20060712183343.GM98476@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <200607121418.58293.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <93f8f44b0607061447k27adb556u306063b09b3d9b0d@mail.gmail.com> <93f8f44b0607111257j10923734i14309e1767abeb09@mail.gmail.com> <20060712043700.GJ98476@over-yonder.net> <200607121418.58293.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:18:57PM -0400 I heard the voice of John Baldwin, and lo! it spake thus: > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 00:37, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:57:49PM +0400 I heard the voice of > > Michael, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > > > cpu0: timer 19005 129 > > > cpu1: timer 9016 61 > > > > That looks a little odd... > > Possibly. Because cpu0's timer starts up sooner, it will generally > have a higher total count (and uptime rate which is what vmstat -i > shows you) than the other CPUs. It's hard to say if 10000 > interrupts is normal for the differential though. That seems high. Well, it's not just the 10000; I've got a thousand differential on my box (and that's with HZ=100). Of course, a 10,000 differential with one of them not even having reached 10,000 yet is pretty big. But look at the rate: 129? HZ=65? I doubt it... that sounds like something REALLY weird going on. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060712183343.GM98476>