From owner-cvs-all  Fri Dec 11 18:43:24 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA03514
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 18:43:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03508
          for <committers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 18:43:22 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA23100;
	Fri, 11 Dec 1998 18:42:48 -0800 (PST)
To: shmit@kublai.com
cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: /etc/rc.local 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 11 Dec 1998 21:32:17 EST."
             <19981211213217.K26279@kublai.com> 
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 18:42:47 -0800
Message-ID: <23096.913430567@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> enough in this instance. Having rc.local get clobbered by FreeBSD is
> pretty bad.

Waitasec, clobbered where?  The upgrade process certainly handles
it and nothing in the current world even touches /etc (and even
if it did in the future, one can easily see it being done so that
rc.local was preserved).  I don't get this argument at all.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message