From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 25 21:42:31 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA08513 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 25 Dec 1996 21:42:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from veda.is (root@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA08508 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 1996 21:42:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from veda.is (adam@ubiq.veda.is [193.4.230.60]) by veda.is (8.8.4/8.8.2) with ESMTP id FAA08766 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 1996 05:44:35 GMT Message-Id: <199612260544.FAA08766@veda.is> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: bsd.port.mk on freefall Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 05:48:31 +0000 From: Adam David Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk freefall still has bsd.port.mk from 4.Dec, while thud has it from 17.Dec. One thing this affects is the md5 checksum file for ports with DIST_SUBDIR. Since ports track current, shouldn't freefall be brought up to date in this? -- Adam David