From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 29 00:04:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C74106566B for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@stringsutils.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7BF8FC08 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (zoraida.natserv.net [66.114.65.147]) by zoraida.natserv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41891704F; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:46:53 -0400 (EDT) References: Message-ID: X-Mailer: http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/ From: Francisco Reyes To: Steven Hartland Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:46:53 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:04:07 -0000 Steven Hartland writes: > Just noticed the following posted on phoronix: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1 > Comments? This was discussed in detail in slashdot.. starting with the fact that most likely debug switches were not turned off for FreeBSD.