From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 11 03:45:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C5B16A4CE for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:45:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9717E43D39 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:45:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAB3lsE1062427; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:47:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4192E086.8060005@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:46:14 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce M Simpson References: <20041111030035.GA70923@VARK.MIT.EDU> <20041111033238.GA723@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20041111033238.GA723@empiric.icir.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: U Area Removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 03:45:20 -0000 Bruce M Simpson wrote: > Hey there, > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:00:35PM -0500, David Schultz wrote: > >>Over the years, the amount of data we have stored in each process' U >>area has eroded to the point where all we have left are the following: >> >> - A struct kinfo_proc that is only used for a.out core dumps. >> This can be reconstructed at the time of the core dump, so >> it doesn't need to be there. > > > Aren't we 100% ELF these days? Surely aout is no longer relevant? > We are 100% ELF toolchain. We can still (in theory) run AOUT binaries so long as you use the COMPAT_AOUT kernel option and have AOUT libraries. But this is offtopic =-) Scott