From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jun 29 19:00:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA01583 for current-outgoing; Sat, 29 Jun 1996 19:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA01554 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 1996 19:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shadows.aeon.net ([194.100.41.1]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id RAA20467 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:40:56 -0700 Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by shadows.aeon.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id AAA12945 for current@freebsd.org; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 00:11:48 +0300 (EET DST) From: Mr Operating System Message-Id: <199606292111.AAA12945@shadows.aeon.net> Subject: outch, wrong address... To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 00:11:48 +0300 (EET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Latin-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > >> 17000 s to 22000 s. I'm not sure what the reason is. Anyone else seeing > > If tcl too 5000s ~= 1.5 hours to build it sure as hell would not go into > i know this is quite off topic, but i'd like to know with what > processor/setup your times are... > i also would be happy to know if there would be times available > for p133 p166 and all ppro speeds... > if only someone would have those... > as soon as one of our clients actually buys dual ppro200 with 512 cache > i'll compile the freebsd there myself... but until then... > mickey mickey