From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 13 19:06:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FC116A4CE; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:06:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE4043D2D; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:06:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DJ6roZ091577; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:06:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6DJ6rTh008945; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:06:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6DJ6rS9008944; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:06:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:06:53 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Lukas Ertl Message-ID: <20040713190653.GC8872@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20040713203158.E548@korben.in.tern> <20040713190119.GB8872@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040713210221.C547@korben.in.tern> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040713210221.C547@korben.in.tern> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysctl debug.debugger_on_panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:06:53 -0000 On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 09:02:57PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > >On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 08:33:34PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > >>Hi there, > >> > >>is the debug.debugger_on_panic sysctl supposed to work after the recent > >>DDB/KDB changes? I set it to 0, but I'm still thrown into DDB after > >>panic. > > > >Yes, the sysctl is still working as expected. > > Well, at least not on this box, or I'm completely misunderstanding > something. I took the time to go over the detailed information you sent about your system (yes, I'm sarcastic -- no such information has been sent) and I can only assume it's your fault :-) As a first: make sure you're not being dropped in the debugger for other reasons. If boot() appears in the backtrace, the sysctl works. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net