From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 11:46:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BB5106564A for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdmail@dnswatch.com) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (fast.dnswatch.com [168.103.150.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFC88FC16 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 11:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dnswatch.com (localhost.dnswatch.com [127.0.0.1]) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p03BkHuv067769; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 03:46:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsdmail@dnswatch.com) Received: from udns0.ultimatedns.net ([168.103.150.26]) (DNSwatchWebMail authenticated user infos) by www.dnswatch.com with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 03:46:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <99e66981c355ee3e3092b532204f4a4a.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> In-Reply-To: <90fd957c01e95dcfd287427792d91351.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> References: <9193ef9ae95084284226832557f8c755.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102125137.4423cb08@ernst.jennejohn.org> <15cc929589a6426f0dad97fac66ed328.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102150551.24f5193e@ernst.jennejohn.org> <0cdfb22d89c8f85ec31704c35982e0e2.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102192946.2ab5429a@centaur.5550h.net> <90fd957c01e95dcfd287427792d91351.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 03:46:25 -0800 (PST) From: fbsdmail@dnswatch.com To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org User-Agent: DNSwatchWebMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Is Gnome2 not supported on the amd64 ARCH? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:46:27 -0000 On Sun, January 2, 2011 10:56 pm, fbsdmail@dnswatch.com wrote: > > On Sun, January 2, 2011 10:29 am, 文鳥 wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 06:42:27 -0800 (PST) >> fbsdmail@dnswatch.com wrote: >> >> >>> Hello again, and thanks for your response. >>> I commented it out after responding to your response, and >>> it happily built. I just figured I'd use the CPUTYPE?= option to gain >>> better amd64 profiling, but apparently it's only _really_ available >>> for the i386 CPU's. I say that because I've always used that option >>> when building on those ARCH types, and never ran into a problem. Oh >>> well, hopefully sometime son, it'll be better supported on the amd64 - >>> fingers crossed. :) >>> >>> Thanks again for taking the time to respond. >>> >>> >>> >>> --Chris >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Please take a look at /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf >> It clearly states that athlon-mp is for the Intel x86 arch _only_. Ahem... Straight from /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf: # Currently the following CPU types are recognized: # Intel x86 architecture: # (AMD CPUs) opteron athlon64 athlon-mp athlon-xp athlon-4 -----------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^ # athlon-tbird athlon k8 k6-3 k6-2 k6 k5 # (Intel CPUs) core2 core nocona pentium4m pentium4 prescott # pentium3m pentium3 pentium-m pentium2 # pentiumpro pentium-mmx pentium i486 i386 # (Via CPUs) c3 c3-2 # Alpha/AXP architecture: ev67 ev6 pca56 ev56 ev5 ev45 ev4 # AMD64 architecture: opteron, athlon64, nocona, prescott, core2 # Intel ia64 architecture: itanium2, itanium Sorry, couldn't resist. ;) No offense intended. >> Wikipedia tells us the same >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_mp#Athlon_XP.2FMP). Therefore I >> assume, that (since you've got amd64 running), your CPU isn't really an >> "athlon-mp", but rather one of the following (again from the make.conf >> example): opteron, athlon64, nocona, prescott, core2 >> >> >> >> PS: I personally use "native", since that gives me the same level of >> optimization as choosing the correct CPU by hand would. Additionally, >> you might consider compiling ports with gcc45, since the base cc doesn't >> support newer CPU features like e.g. SSE4.2. > > Right you are. :) > As I stated to Luchesar, in my last reply, it's been awhile since > I actually researched make(1) && make.conf(5). The last amd64 boxes > I built using ths CPUTYPE?=athlon-mp were on 8-(PRE)RELEASE. > In fact the only reason I chose athlon-mp is because one of the > first ports I built echoed that in the config flags during the build. So > without any research, I figured that to be (howeer mis- takenly) the > correct choice. :) > > Thank you for your thoughtful reply. > > > --Chris > > >> >> Best regards >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > > -- > kern: > FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- kern: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64