From owner-freebsd-current  Sat May 16 15:54:26 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA21909
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 16 May 1998 15:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21904
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 16 May 1998 15:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA28823;
	Sat, 16 May 1998 22:54:19 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id AAA00796;
	Sun, 17 May 1998 00:54:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <19980517005409.53106@follo.net>
Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 00:54:09 +0200
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Cc: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Soft update vs noatime
References: <19980516123741.53851@follo.net> <Pine.BSF.3.95.980516120647.16642H-100000@current1.whistle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980516120647.16642H-100000@current1.whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Sat, May 16, 1998 at 12:06:59PM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, May 16, 1998 at 12:06:59PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> you're confusing noatime and async..

Not really - I seem to remember _both_ creating problems.  However, I can't
find any messages that refer to this, so I might have remembered wrongly.

Eivind.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message