From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 13 11: 4:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B52437B435; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:03:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id fBDJ3sq70413; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:03:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:03:54 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200112131903.fBDJ3sq70413@apollo.backplane.com> To: Robert Watson Cc: David Greenman , Jordan Hubbard , Peter Wemm , Mike Smith , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@mass.dis.org Subject: Re: NFS Patch #4 -- survived overnight test. (was Re: Found NFS data corruption bug... (was Re:...)) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :Hmm. I'm OK with a commit to -CURRENT, but would really appreciate it if :you made it a week before MFC to -STABLE. Given your statement just a few :lines earlier about needing more review from VM types, that would allow a :bit more time for necessary review. I agree, given the impending 4.5 :release, we should MFC it as far before release as possible, but three :days is a little below my threshold for sensitive NFS/file system changes ::-). : :Thanks, : :Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project I can hold-off the vm_page_set_validclean() patch for a week but there is no reason not to 3-day MFC the rest of the bug fixes. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message