From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 15:38:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7511065690 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E648FC6D for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n7KFZ0A0084744; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:35:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n7KFZ0X9084743; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:35:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:35:00 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Andrew Gould Message-ID: <20090820153500.GD84448@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4A89BD3E.8020804@toyon.com> <4A89CA18.7000506@toyon.com> <4A89D4F9.9020508@toyon.com> <20090818032736.4702f243@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: RW , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packages available for different FreeBSD versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:38:29 -0000 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:05:27AM -0500, Andrew Gould wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:27 PM, RW wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:41:12 -0500 > > Andrew Gould wrote: > > > >> STABLE is what it sounds like. > > > > I don't think it is what it sounds like - STABLE branches are > > development branches with stable binary interfaces. It's the security > > branches that are intended for production use. > > > > From: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/index.html > > "During the lifetime of each major release, an individual branch may > also be termed STABLE. This indicates that the FreeBSD Project > believes that the branch is of sufficiently proven quality to be used > by a wide range of users. Branches that need further testing before > being widely adopted are named CURRENT." Yes, the snapshot is of a STABLE version when it is past the totally on the edge CURRENT condition. It is pretty close to becoming a RELEASE version. Generally only some more testing and getting ports ready for that version separates STABLE from RELEASE. CURRENT is where new development is happening. In some sense CURRENT is akin to an early (pre) Alpha version, STABLE is akin to a late Beta (almost release) version and RELEASE is the supported release of the version. But it is not quite that. Most companies do not put out their development source or a snapshot of of the system as they are working on it. They hold that secret and only release something after pretty much everything locked in before they let anyone in the public see it. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"