From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 22 23:27:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611C3FEF for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7C98FC12 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TmYTK-0006uf-5B for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:27:14 -0800 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 15:27:14 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1356218834151-5771583.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: 9.1 minimal ram requirements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:27:21 -0000 Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.