From owner-freebsd-net Tue May 12 06:34:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA01768 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 May 1998 06:34:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from silver.sms.fi (silver.sms.fi [194.111.122.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA01673; Tue, 12 May 1998 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pete@silver.sms.fi) Received: (from pete@localhost) by silver.sms.fi (8.8.8/8.7.3) id QAA07424; Tue, 12 May 1998 16:32:39 +0300 (EEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 16:32:39 +0300 (EEST) From: Petri Helenius To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav ) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <13656.20319.45529.52989@silver.sms.fi> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id GAA01676 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav ) writes: > > Naturally, I would prefer the first alternative. It is MHO (and I have > voiced it before) that FreeBSD should jump on board the IPv6 train as > soon as possible. I have just sent an e-mail to Francis Dupont (author > of the INRIA IPv6 stack) expressing more or less what I am writing > here. > > So how do you feel about integrating the INRIA IPv6 stack into FreeBSD > CURRENT? > I would definetly like to see that happen. Pete To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message