From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 18 12:25:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA00638 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 12:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA00633 Thu, 18 Apr 1996 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebsd.ki.net (root@freebsd.ki.net [205.150.102.51]) by ki.net (8.7.4/8.7.4) with ESMTP id PAA10897; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:25:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by freebsd.ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id PAA07151; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:25:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: freebsd.ki.net: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:25:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" cc: "John A. Booth" , compland@ism.com.br, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MajorDomo on FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199604181800.LAA25451@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 18 Apr 1996, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > (if i may play devil's advocate a moment) > > why are you using majordomo-1.93 in place of majordomo-1.92 > (if i may play devil's advocate a moment) What's wrong with 1.93 vs 1.92? The only problem with 1.93 that I've found so far (and I've never used 1.92 *shrug*) had to do with the way resend dealt with moderated groups...so I fixed it *shrug* > John A. Booth wrote: > > > > > I just installed Majordomo-1.93 in a FreeBSD box. > > > Majordomo seems to be ok: I create a test list. I can subscribe to it, > > > unsubscribe, all the commands. But if I send a mail to that list , it just > > > disappears ! It vanishes , go nowhere. Not to the list, not to the > > > list-owner, to nobody. > > > I checked the Majordomo FAQ, the Mqjordomo mailing list archives and find > > > nothing. Somebody has an idea ? > > > I'm using FreeBSD-stable, Sendmail 8.6.12, Perl 5.0.1m, Majordomo 1.93 > > I've got the same problem with FreeBSD 2.01R. If I try to execute > > the resend script it ends up telling me one of the files it needs (via > > the pearl require) can't be accessed. This may be the problem. > > > I've been running 1.93 under 2.1.0-RELEASE and -stable for the past 7 months or so, with not noticeable problems. Can you send me an exact copy of your error message? Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org