Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:55:25 +1100 From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE Message-ID: <20050303235525.GC8805@bcd.geek.com.au> In-Reply-To: <12311.1109893353@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <87ll94iait.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <12311.1109893353@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:42:33AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > The fact that you just need to break one single sector in CGD before > you get the entire disk contents gives a disadvantage to CGD of > 2^26 before we even consider the nature of the attack. That is not > conservative when it could have been trivially avoided. The mechanisms gbde takes to avoid it are far from trivial. -- Dan. --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFCJ6PtEAVxvV4N66cRAu2aAJ90wGQvnTXbr8az6JUtat0FRxe3YACfXFPU AmOzn4bCdW/XSkeRhcf21as= =yaj5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050303235525.GC8805>