From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 8 18:50:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A2B16A4CE; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:50:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.originative.co.uk (freebsd.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.249.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6682243D41; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:50:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul@mx1.originative.co.uk) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.originative.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFBC1556F; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:50:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.originative.co.uk ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 36437-06; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:50:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mx1.originative.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0759815586; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:50:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:50:33 +0000 From: Paul Richards To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20041108185033.GB34058@myrddin.originative.co.uk> References: <200411061133.iA6BXhHT086940@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041106163748.GB38881@ip.net.ua> <200411061859.56624.max@love2party.net> <418D632E.2020402@root.org> <20041107000311.GA42221@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041107000311.GA42221@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Nate Lawson cc: Max Laier Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_param.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 18:50:47 -0000 On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 04:03:12PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 03:50:06PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > I was traveling out of the country so I didn't get a chance to comment. > > The two caveats I'm aware of is a slight loss in processes that are > > CPU bound and an audio hum from ACPI CPU idling. The latter is rather > > interesting actually. At hz=100, it's just a quiet low buzz but at > > 1000, it is readily audible on many laptops and annoying. Windows uses > > hz=1000 too and has the same problem. I believe it's related to the > > capacitors and other devices charging/discharging when clocks are stopped. > > Can we play music by modulating the value of hz? :) I remember some code for the Commodore Pets that you could use to play notes on a nearby radio by tweaking some spinning loops. Quite a neat trick at the time since there wasn't any sound hardware. Paul.