From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 25 20:00:55 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9E016A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:00:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nala.dohd.org (xaa.demon.nl [83.160.166.71])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C217E43D49
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:00:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@dohd.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost.local.dohd.org [127.0.0.1])
	by nala.dohd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A005F117D1
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:00:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nala.dohd.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eeyore.local.dohd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 27195-02-5 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:00:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by nala.dohd.org (Postfix, from userid 1008)
	id 5A4E8117CF; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:00:52 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:00:52 +0200
From: Mark Huizer <freebsd+current@dohd.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050425200052.GC24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
References: <20050425183733.GB24146@eeyore.local.dohd.org>
	<2323.216.177.243.38.1114457612.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2323.216.177.243.38.1114457612.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dohd.org
Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:00:55 -0000

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 12:33:32PM -0700, /dev/null wrote:
> I don't want to sound like a smart a$$, or know-it-all. But could this not
> also be a simple case of Induction? Is it possible that something has
> changed in the environment that might interfere with the NIC or cabling?
> I mean it wouldn't have to completely clobber the connection, but simply
> impeed it slightly, which would make it crap out under any type of load.
> Just thought I'd mention it FWIW.

Well, if such a simple reinstall can make such a big difference, I would
sincerely start questioning computers ;-)
But apart from a table in the attic moving 10 centimeter, nothing
changed. 

Mark


-- 
Nice testing in little China...