From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 21 09:14:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646EF16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.uu.se [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA3B43D1D for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:14:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id F2BEC4983; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:14:49 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s129031; Mon, 21 Mar 05 10:14:40 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1A44856; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:14:40 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 9C57138012; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:14:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF805C002; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:14:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:14:40 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= In-Reply-To: <20050320163928.H693@antec.home> Message-ID: References: <20050320221930.GA11100@fan.priv.at> <20050320163928.H693@antec.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-293463789-1718851445-1111396480=:5467" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xwrapper doesn't use .xinitrc, or does it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:14:51 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---293463789-1718851445-1111396480=:5467 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Mikko Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Andreas Davour wrote: > >> I have just rebuilt my system and a few things aren't as they used to be= =2E=20 >> When I try to start X with Xwrapper no xterms or other windows appear.= =20 >> Isn't Xwrapper starting the stuff in .xinitrc like "startx" used to do f= or=20 >> me (but wont do, since it no longer has the authority to do so)?? >>=20 >> Isn't there some documentation for Xwrapper somewhere? > > You want startx(1). The .xinitrc file is read by "xinit", btw. I used to start X using startx. Now it doesn't work for anybody but=20 root. Of course I can set "the bit" on the X image, but I guessed there=20 was a reason somebody invented Xwrapper. /andreas --=20 A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ---293463789-1718851445-1111396480=:5467--