Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 03:29:10 -0800 (PST) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk patch Message-ID: <199611111129.DAA09657@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <199611101737.JAA17361@relay.nuxi.com> (obrien@NUXI.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Satoshi Asami writes: * > * MANPAGES= 1/zmrx.1 1/zmtx.1 * > * > Actually, that's a good idea. What do people think, is the MAN[1-9LN] * > set I sent out earlier or a single MANPAGES variable better? * * I still kinda like the single MANPAGES vs. MAN[1-9LN]. But not very * strongly. I prefer MAN[1-9LN] simply because there are many ports out there that already have similar variables and is easy to convert. ;) (Take a look at japanese/Canna/Makefile, for instance.) But not very strongly, either. David's idea is very slick and makes bsd.port.mk slightly shorter too. What about other people? Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611111129.DAA09657>