From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 7 10:48:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.brfmasthugget.se (mail.thalamus.nu [212.31.160.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F343037B405 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:48:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from lockdown.nodomain [212.31.164.147] by mail.brfmasthugget.se (SMTPD32-7.04) id ABE227900AC; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 19:48:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:48:03 +0100 From: Martin Faxér To: Wilko Bulte Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-Id: <20020207194803.389b17ec.gmh003532@brfmasthugget.se> In-Reply-To: <20020207190807.A19376@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20020207101501.A89056@fit.vutbr.cz> <20020207190807.A19376@freebie.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--freebsd5.0) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100 Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > > I'm just looking for a basic idea of what other people have been > > > seeing for performance when they run current. > > > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE > > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled > > in -current. > > I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has WC enabled as well. -STABLE has it enabled indeed, but -CURRENT does not (afaik). Read what he said. :-) > > -- > | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org > |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message