From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan 26 17:54:06 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA05590
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:54:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA05548
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:54:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca13-237.ix.netcom.com [209.109.238.237]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA01094; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.1/8.6.9) id RAA64117; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199901270151.RAA64117@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
CC: obrien@NUXI.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199901270130.RAA08180@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (message
	from Steve Kargl on Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:30:35 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: removing f2c from base distribution
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

 * Well, actually I did f2c as a port, and it does indeed fit 
 * inside the ports paradigm.  Please, see my original email in
 * the thread.

Yes, I know that.  I was just wondering why people would want it
otherwise.

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message