From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 22 05:31:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA22823 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 05:31:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA22805 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 05:31:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id MAA04314; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:40:55 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199809221040.MAA04314@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Dummynet backout ? To: Studded@dal.net (Studded) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:40:55 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <36078521.D99AF2C1@dal.net> from "Studded" at Sep 22, 98 04:07:58 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Are the changes going to be moved forward into 3.0 now that they seem > to be fixed up? I was thinking about this today and early adopters of > this change in -Stable are going to be discouraged from moving to > 3.0-Release, and/or bit in the butt if they do. i have patches for -current which i have posted to -net a few days ago, and apparently nobody had the time to try them. Since we are in beta i highly doubt that they will go in unless someone does the testing. luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message