From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 11 03:09:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EAC106566B for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itechbear@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DDA8FC15 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so4187177obb.13 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:09:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WtrXeHz5A3I6m9zBJ0Bx1R6nQyQ1oelUiuwr30zaAlE=; b=UvywfuGqqdtJMqDo9SG/8F3e4DcOYP9L3XpqV1sRAjjNVgceQzE606HaO6O2yq5Ckv 2w9iqIChmysNMQaMDxK8zAbj7ISS2GHCbQEzqEl3E7Z2AjzmADX4JgxgWWZEKXrTVERE yBqjQzXhHObGkc7wPcXcT20rWkNsnmJ7eDmYNvCMJq2uvRQ5ujUYmVKNBFpe1Do45Skm xKsBvDiRj0JGsKRbC4RsH7r5NfZBLQmbgOex5MTgz6qXDMFQ1QV3WsXIdTzbu1e1GnJm pPoQHURrz+pyllwqt5BJ9ECKPSBVqys4iIsCvoBFxFZFd+psSaHMDHDJV/jj953gMxge U5ng== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.12.8 with SMTP id u8mr7024626oeb.46.1344654595345; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.4.204 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:09:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:09:55 +0800 Message-ID: From: HU Dong To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, thomas.sander@gmx.de Subject: Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 03:09:56 -0000 I just submitted a patch ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170532 ) for devel/kdbg, updating it from 2.2.0 to 2.5.1. Since I'm not familiar with cmake, I didn't figure out how to make "DOCS" component optional. Hope someone could help. B.R. HU Dong On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > Reply from maintainer. > On 10 Aug 2012 11:12, "Thomas Sander" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > It has no reason why the version is so old. You can submit a PR. > > > > B.R. > > Thomas > > > > 2012/8/10 Chris Rees > > > >> Copying in maintainer. > >> On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" wrote: > >> > >>> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port > >>> devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a > >>> little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it > >>> should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. > >>> > >>> B.R. > >>> HU Dong > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >