From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 31 8:20:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from totem.fix.no (totem.fix.no [213.142.66.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B994B37BE8E for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 08:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anders@totem.fix.no) Received: by totem.fix.no (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63B26572B; Wed, 31 May 2000 17:21:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 17:21:59 +0200 From: Anders Nordby To: Will Andrews Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Nessus* ports Message-ID: <20000531172159.A76711@totem.fix.no> References: <20000531103232.E22499@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000531103232.E22499@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@technologist.com on Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:32:32AM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE X-Warning: Listen, and thou shall not fear. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 10:32:32AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: >> I noticed that the Nessus port is a year old and Nessus 1.0.0 was >> released, so I updated the four Nessus ports (security/nessus, >> security/nessus-libnasl, security/nessus-libraries, >> security/nessus-plugins) and they're attached onto this e-mail. Hopefully, >> all goes well... > These need to be resubmitted as diffs against the current ports (the > Handbook specifically states "shars for new ports, unified diffs for > updates", I believe, although I could be wrong). I have only one thing to say: read PR ports/18727. -- Anders. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message