From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 21 10:12:48 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8867C16A4BF
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web14107.mail.yahoo.com (web14107.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.172.137])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 975DC43F75
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk)
Message-ID: <20031021171246.64372.qmail@web14107.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [194.248.174.33] by web14107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:12:46 CEST
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:12:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Claus=20Guttesen?= <cguttesen@yahoo.dk>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>,
	Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20031021163957.GA66248@rot13.obsecurity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
cc: Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Problems with NFS (client) under 5.1.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:12:48 -0000

hi.

> 
> Does Linux do NFSv3 yet?  I thought that at least
> until recently there
> were stability issues and it was recommended it not
> be used.
> 

I had some problems with stale NFS handle when
NFS-mounting two FreeBSD 5.1 client (one with the
frozen 5.1 and one as of Oct. 10'th) to a Linux server
with ReiserFS.

When I mounted with ver. 2 the problems went away on
the FreeBSD with source from Oct. 10'th and have less
stale NFS handles with the frozen 5.1.

regards
Claus


Yahoo! Mail (http://dk.mail.yahoo.com) - Gratis: 6 MB lagerplads, spamfilter og virusscan