From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 30 21:37:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217EA106564A for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:37:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jktrigg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77238FC0C for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so2069770wyj.13 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:37:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4ue4Pt5pRtN2J7o4kZLdAVP5MUEFSpVYEReqTZXxXFU=; b=uxKPGb1PnBIRXp6VNlSt4HUJYXJ3VcP/qq0hI9O/32/davWqn/Llb6b2mcFLdnZBnb qKwzsDIlc7NTs01+sEFmv3PJnRJ5VL+BlrJbQrjdM7rSY238p4sa7TPynZM72xRUdyYc lraXmA1boXEY0oe06Sw/vAQqu8YLQsBkppOzQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.137.36 with SMTP id x36mr6321765wei.41.1317417020549; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jktrigg@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.39.149 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:10:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110930091002.GA1378@droso.net> References: <20110929084725.GN91943@hoeg.nl> <4E8433F5.30005@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20110929090743.GP91943@hoeg.nl> <20110929091859.GQ91943@hoeg.nl> <20110929134310.6585124d.stas@FreeBSD.org> <20110930084015.GV91943@hoeg.nl> <20110930091002.GA1378@droso.net> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:10:20 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BmgSHcgI017WiNqkzW4Zq-voBhI Message-ID: From: Jim Trigg To: Freebsd Ports List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: Instafix for FreeBSD ports brokenness on 10.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:37:29 -0000 On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: > That said, this patch is the wrong place to fix a problem to autotools. > It needs to be fixed in autotools, not bsd.port.mk. =A0No matter if it's > bsd.ports.mk or autotools, such a fix needs proper testing, for which > we do not currently have the resources as we are concentrating on > releasing 9.0. =A0I would suggest you do the same and make 9.0 the best > release possible during the next few weeks, after that we'll start > looking into 10.0. I have to admit that my reaction is not so much "Why won't you fix ports for 10.0" as "Why was 9.0 dropped out of CURRENT and 10.0 introduced before 9.0 went STABLE?" Jim