From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sat Sep 19 16:39:14 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAE5A058C9
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:39:14 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F071917
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:39:13 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-125-111.dynamic.qsc.de
 [92.195.125.111])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388903CD71;
 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:39:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t8JGdBL7018300;
 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:39:11 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de)
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:39:11 +0200
From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HTTPS on freebsd.org, git, reproducible builds
Message-Id: <20150919183911.4a064bff.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <55FD6C49.6090008@hiwaay.net>
References: <CAD2Ti2_YNkNi2b=PzFCwu3PVaP8hOzADys3=-k0AqvsDRhJpzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <86vbb7dhaa.fsf@nine.des.no> <20150918134804.GU3158@zxy.spb.ru>
 <86oagzwf8j.fsf@nine.des.no> <20150919125023.GA21849@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20150919151517.739ab70a.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <20150919133248.GB21849@zxy.spb.ru> <55FD6C49.6090008@hiwaay.net>
Reply-To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Organization: EDVAX
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:39:14 -0000

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 09:13:39 -0453.75, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> I *think* all they are planning is using the same 'pkg' system to 
> maintain *separate* repos of software, still system *separate* from user 
> pkg's, but I could be way off ....

Yes, that's the plan, as far as I know. The pkg program will be
used to install and update system components based on binary
packages, similarly to how it deals with ports. Still there will
be the clear distinction between the OS and the installed ports.
I don't know if there will be two databases (one for the OS
packages, one for the ports packages) or if both will be
recorded in the same file...



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...