From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sun Mar 20 16:07:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D12AD620F for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39CC211 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m184so187406317iof.1 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:07:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=PYC2H6Y9REaVn+vAwNkDkBAIu0fyF7tvA0fP16MpIpQ=; b=Q3El3jN8Pjy6ZIX8NJMUBx9KbSczfiKgTDfniFt84wdt9vsiWw9glbe5veZnIggPjv C0rUS9pe83IU5I0YcYnhMsbOdEhcBFIkoVzpqfg/vHnVFPdbmwtOMcvx7LWQ8U+9Cjek 1ZIRxP/2TP3LVJj3Za3+GSxwEbkBIttg56RGNi/YCetDRuoieMAfTcp+YHigFiiyJKi5 qBNEq1IY/1BgYNEc2szBbjB+t2JHKbxxR+cPwZ1AbBZXxFB1mVpMg7bifPjoqQU2TJFn 8dBAS/BuuScHj9ehqLyyTkGejEm6ephAO8XNbNkyNUnGp9Ch/WiWY2TlAfik3ivrzkaY PpsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=PYC2H6Y9REaVn+vAwNkDkBAIu0fyF7tvA0fP16MpIpQ=; b=AR8fZYUPp6h01QFz3CKVA7H+wujNsHzq8cBzAbSj7RwoXfeSdzjk7UyVlGQHTCm+j3 igAi3u8RVIaY/8lgZnRmtL8Werhvk5KYZjdyaHNyIlsdQWDz140wvUzqh7epk1uW0ejs JAj8Mfg1xi87BiXYxX0pgJ3tSr6ToDzmOHZiG6CuTvc+ecwcbZOO+BqCb8xBcvBnRcVB nrrxh3DpQk6q/cbzwnFfvTYa63wbrG4esh1U899Jg7csP8UH1HdzbKMxdAttAdRrhjAG ic3m1Q95YF6Ez5T65m9Y+OM15rZ+KmM9QQwVccZAvC4tyGaAzM23hK8depcSMmy5fP7P nD3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLGMin8EBKcIdcbxbhTcLT9sy8RlYrk+Y4+PrLjBXSMMtIZw1eH0oklDSKzZM2uVkGEDkuAvIT9UnVvZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.35.82 with SMTP id j79mr2981585ioj.123.1458490053342; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.14.19 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:07:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56EEA5EC.9080704@gmail.com> References: <56EEA5EC.9080704@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 09:07:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A little confusing inconsistency From: Adrian Chadd To: "Jukka A. Ukkonen" Cc: freebsd-arm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:07:34 -0000 It's just some inconsistency in how it's done. -a On 20 March 2016 at 06:30, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote: > > Hello all, > > Why does sysctl report hw.platform on arm and hw.model on amd64? > The content is apparently intended to be analogous. > > E.g. on RPI2 ... > hw.platform: bcm2836 > > and then on amd64 ... > hw.model: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 4162 EE > > Is this just a little lapsus or intentional for some reason? > I noticed this when I tried bsdstats on RPI2. It complained > about missing OID hw.model. > > --jau > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"