Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:55:05 -1000 From: Parv <parv@pair.com> To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> Cc: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ?? Message-ID: <20080711155505.GA1892@holstein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <B194B820-D02B-4EE8-9834-0DFE76683B82@ece.cmu.edu> References: <200807100340.38399.david@vizion2000.net> <20080710064246.346e2200@scorpio> <20080711080103.GA2128@holstein.holy.cow> <FFFF7EDF-C4F9-470E-8951-722E153F891E@khera.org> <B194B820-D02B-4EE8-9834-0DFE76683B82@ece.cmu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <B194B820-D02B-4EE8-9834-0DFE76683B82@ece.cmu.edu>, wrote Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH thusly... > > > On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote: > >> When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't >> have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out >> and evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this. > > As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? > (Bleeding-edge Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) We are talking about a port here, not part of the base FreeBSD OS. Expecting a recent stable perl version six months after its release, in relative quietness, is not considered urgent, I think. Mind that perl was separated from base OS in order to have relatively fresh perl around, and not to wait for FreeBSD releases to get perl updated. A perl5.10 can easily exist with perl5 & perl5.8 ports. Some of the reasons for my excitement are faster performance of regex engine, named captures, ability to relocate (which would be interesting to see if that works or advisable within Ports infrastructure). - Parv --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080711155505.GA1892>