From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 22 10:56:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from inbox.org (inbox.org [216.22.145.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A64C37BF0B for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:56:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd@inbox.org) Received: from localhost (bsd@localhost) by inbox.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA06066; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:55:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:55:33 -0500 (EST) From: "Mr. K." To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Alejandro Ramirez , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Chrooted telnet support in 4.x??? In-Reply-To: <33001.953750445@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG what would be even cooler is if we could jail() a user natively at login. I bet this patch could be easily modified to use jail() instead of chroot(). On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <051001bf942c$87e3fa40$020a0a0a@megared.net.mx>, "Alejandro Ramirez" > writes: > >Hi, > > > >Will FreeBSD 4.x will be able to chroot telnet sessions natively???, or are > >there any plans to integrate this patches to the base system: > > Investigate the jail(8) facility in 4.x, it is *far* stronger than > anything chroot(2) has to offer. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member > phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." > FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message