Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:27:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206234] [PATCH] editors/openoffice-4: use openssl instead of nss Message-ID: <bug-206234-25061-o3La2o3ECl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-206234-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206234 --- Comment #1 from Arrigo Marchiori <ardovm@yahoo.it> --- Created attachment 165563 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=165563&action=edit Upstream patch (vanilla, to be copied into the files/ directory) This file is the ``vanilla'' patch proposed by upstream: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84969&action=diff It works if copied into the files/ directory of the editors/openoffice-4 port. I am not sure if it is a good idea to split it into many files, each one patching a single source file, as requested in Porter's Handbook chapter 4.4. In fact, it seems that the files/ directory already contains ``bulk'' patches that affect many files. I am also not sure if it is advisable to apply this fix selectively, i.e. leave to the user the choice between OpenSSL and libnss. Please advise if you think so, and kindly give me some pointers to the documentation on such process (I could not find any information on _selective_ patching in the Porter's Handbook). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206234-25061-o3La2o3ECl>