From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jun 25 11:52:37 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA01872
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 11:52:37 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA01865
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 11:52:34 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA05369
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sun, 25 Jun 1995 13:35:38 -0500
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA15115; 25 Jun 95 13:34:56 CDT (Sun)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id NAA15112; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 13:34:56 -0500
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199506251834.NAA15112@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a router
To: dennis@et.htp.com (dennis)
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 13:34:55 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506251559.LAA26654@mail.htp.com> from "dennis" at Jun 25, 95 11:59:38 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 351       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I love this "I can demonstrate" stuff. Try the hat on yourself. To get from
> a to b to c requires 2 transmission times at 10mbs (because you have to wait
> for the full frame to arrive, which was what we were talking about) , which
> means that net throughput cannot be greater than 50% of 10mbs.

I think you're confusing latency with throughput.