From owner-cvs-ports  Mon Apr 17 18:16:09 1995
Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA07887
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 18:16:09 -0700
Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA07878
          ; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 18:16:04 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA22744; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 18:16:02 -0700
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 18:16:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199504180116.SAA22744@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jmz@freefall.cdrom.com
CC: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <199504180012.RAB04187@freefall.cdrom.com> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Mon, 17 Apr 1995 17:12:56 -0700)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/mltex Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 *   Say that the port is interactive. This not true, but since it is a TeX
 *   variant which overwrite a previous installed version of the "regular"
 *   TeX, it is better to not build tex AND mltex by default.

If you set IS_INTERACTIVE anyway, why don't you warn and ask the user
about it?  Take a look at japanese/tcl/{Makefile,pkg/REQ} for
examples.

Satoshi