From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 23 13:57:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53508D00; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D325CF4B; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by webck51 with SMTP id ck51so11721511web.2; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:57:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ftICMxvyllUHLiQvSJTlE02+ZxnPj4WRSqxhDKrgs3c=; b=E10MVzE4p0hExw0XjtoAZvjLTBa4tE2OQ3qN1PF1Xm8uZjgvRmgIabG903Wnhskknf 2VH0RaKCUaSc723iDGhiqjf1z1d1ngGguioJsYfBdfCgjF7cqTMhUaN+uSJPEVRCJcIE lYa10lngtU4rccfAo12aYukQ1wu8oIeRktVYBhvgzgmZ/ToztUOb2yjcaTmZMhRTy6yL wDHwGRY/7h5kdb6Hd31leP9hmJTXpod37i/ScF3mDhPdTFkiRZw24pq7YAqrCaMqZZwt LDvSHCyEMRlIDFcpu5oopKPnk5OjYG134k92GEKv2FPQK9vNWcjsYxVEu2C8xOkdwsnU ZDOw== X-Received: by 10.180.218.73 with SMTP id pe9mr6183388wic.79.1427119034259; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ey10sm6549947wib.2.2015.03.23.06.57.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:57:11 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: svn commit: r381955 - head/graphics/gdal Message-ID: <20150323135711.GB27378@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201503222011.t2MKBHq7091087@svn.freebsd.org> <20150323015759.GA34402@FreeBSD.org> <550F8505.8010600@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <550F8505.8010600@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:57:16 -0000 --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:14:13PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 3/22/2015 8:58 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 08:11:17PM +0000, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > >> New Revision: 381955 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/381955 > >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r381955/ > >> > >> Log: > >> - Use -lpthread instead of -pthread > >=20 > > Is -pthread going away anytime soon? I'm a bit worried of more alike > > changing one to another; since they're identical right now on FreeBSD, > > I'd rather reduce amount of patching, leaving whatever is picked by > > upstream, unless -lpthread really should be preferred over -pthread > > for some reason I'm unaware of (and ready to learn about). > >=20 > > ./danfe > >=20 >=20 > It's a pointless change. Tijl explains here > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D198116#c4 >=20 This is not pointless at all this is a long standing thing that should be cleaned out for a while, portmgr already gave long ago some blanket to some developers to remove that along with all usage of PTHREAD_LIBS. The reason = is that it is confusing for maintainers, as if they take example on some of our existing ports they might be driven in the wrong direction. Working in cleaning up those is imho important Regards, Bapt --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUQG7cACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Exz+gCguSpaCVjJ+06NUplMI28432PN Cs0AnjBIPoQzqkXs2fp48QfqWQCvyAcx =VePG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--