From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon May 18 15:04:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA16630 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Mon, 18 May 1998 15:04:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phoenix.welearn.com.au (suebla.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.44.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA16456 for ; Mon, 18 May 1998 15:03:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sue@phoenix.welearn.com.au) Received: (from sue@localhost) by phoenix.welearn.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA19506; Tue, 19 May 1998 08:02:49 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <19980519080247.08529@welearn.com.au> Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 08:02:47 +1000 From: Sue Blake To: Atipa Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why we should support Microsoft... References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: ; from Atipa on Mon, May 18, 1998 at 12:02:55PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, May 18, 1998 at 12:02:55PM -0600, Atipa wrote: > > > > I know I am going out on a limbe here, but I do not think the Justice > Department should make any decisions on the software industry, and I think > Microsoft should be allowed to ship whatever the hell it wants. I fail to see what on earth miscellaneous causes have got to do with FreeBSD advocacy, but my real beef is the cross posting. Is anyone else getting fed up with reading every damn message of a thread twice, once in -chat and once in -advocacy? Maybe we should put a basic email tutorial on the CDs which has to be successfully completed before the installation will work :-) -- Regards, -*Sue*- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message